Date of publication: 2017-07-09 13:06
article 875 drafted with MAL intention to kill 5 lakh kashmiri pandits kill the maharaja of kashmir. and agaist indian democracy rule, abdullas dynasty want to rule for ever join hands with pakisthan ( create terrotists) and attack india every often..
The system requirements for PowerPoint Templates are: Microsoft Office PowerPoint 7558, 7557, 7565 and 7568 with Microsoft® Windows® operating systems compatible with Windows XP, Vista®, Windows 7 or Windows 8
Many students make the mistake of picking this kind of thesis to defend. It requires serious experimental evidence to defend, unless your real thesis is of the previous form, ., only process X is possible. Selected excerpts from protocols and surveys of your officemates are not psychological evidence, no matter how much they might have inspired your work.
As for as author of this volume is concerned. He is a die hard Indian, their is no way he would be thinking for the benefit of Kashmiris.
Better keep ur (Indian 8767 s) ass on ground rather being kicked of from Kashmir.
Ref :Article 875: The untold story
Dear Maj Gen Sheru Thapliyal
Greetings. I congratulate you for writing such a wonderful article on Kashmir issue, packed with historical and legal facts.
People say Neheru and Sheikh Abdullah were genetically related. Is that a correct fact.?
Keep writing on Kashmire in FACE BOOK. Let others know the truth
Sheikh Mohammed Abdullah Charismatic Kashmiri leader who never let go of his dream of ruling an independent Kashmir even while masquerading as a secularist — architect of Article 875 along with Nehru. He must share with Nehru the grave consequences. Lion of Kashmir brought Nehru under his spell from 6988 onwards to the extent that in May 6997 when he was arrested by the Maharaja for sedition, Nehru represented Sheikh as his lawyer and was even arrested in Jun 6997 by the Maharaja while trying to enter J& K. Finally Nehru had to eat the humble pie by arresting Sheikh Abdullah for sedition on 9 Aug 6958.
In nature, the evolution of matter follows a certain path, although how, when, and in what form this is realised, depends upon accidental circumstances. For example, whether life was created or not on earth depended on a whole series of accidental factors, such as the presence of water, different chemical elements, the earth's distance from the sun, an atmosphere, etc. "It is the nature of matter to advance to the evolution of thinking beings", states Engels, "hence, too, this always necessarily occurs whenever the conditions for it (not necessarily identical at all places and times) are present…what is maintained to be necessary is composed of sheer accidents, and the so-called accidental is the form behind which necessity hides itself."
Thanks for the post
Actually I have few days and defend my thesis, I am so worry about their feedback and their questions that unpredicted that could show you as fool. I am also worry about presentation type, I don 8767 t now if I am supposed to use Latex beamer or PPT, I know content is important. I am freaking out from their feedback about my research and gives me logical error, my research doesn 8767 t have literature so I was struggling through my research what is the right? Please I need advice.
The world in which we live is a unity of contradictions or a unity of opposites: cold-heat, light-darkness, Capital-Labour, birth-death, riches-poverty, positive-negative, boom-slump, thinking-being, finite-infinite, repulsion-attraction, left-right, above-below, evolution-revolution, chance-necessity, sale-purchase, and so on.
The format of the defence varies from country to country. Having studied in the UK, my viva-voce defence was essentially an interview with one internal and one external examiner. In other countries it 8767 s common to have public examinations with a whole panel of examiners and an audience of colleagues, family and friends.
"The contradiction, however, is the source of all movement and life only in so far as it contains a contradiction can anything have movement, power, and effect." (Hegel). "In brief", states Lenin, "dialectics can be defined as the doctrine of the unity of opposites. This embodies the essence of dialectics…"
Just as colossal subterranean pressures that accumulate and periodically break through the earth's crust in the form of earthquakes, so gradual changes in the consciousness of workers lead to an explosion in the class struggle. A strike in a factory is not caused by outside "agitators", but is produced by an accumulation of changes within the factory that finally pushes the workforce to strike. The "cause" of the strike maybe something quite small and incidental, a tea-break for instance, but it has become "the last straw that breaks the camel's back", to use a popular (dialectical) expression. It has become the catalyst whereby quantity changes into quality.