Examples of a

Financing Balance of Payments Adjustment: Options in the

Date of publication: 2017-09-01 10:26

The claims were brought against utilities by states complaining that carbon emissions from power plants were contributing to harm from climate change. The Court devoted only a few cryptic sentences to the issue of standing. Four Justices found standing based on Massachusetts v. EPA , the Court’s path-breaking opinion on climate change, while four others rejected standing, either “adhering to a dissenting opinion in Massachusetts or regarding that decision as distinguishable.” As a result, the lower court’s finding of standing was affirmed by an equally divided Court.

Russian & Soviet Chess Sets - Welcome to the Chess Museum

Though falling comfortably in the genre of economic analysis of contract, Professor Brooks’s essay nevertheless provides some relief from the excesses of economic theorizing about the law. I will confine my comments to the conceptual and normative features of the economic analysis of contract, leaving it to others more versed in economic analysis than I to assess the success of his objections to the conventional view. It would be something of an understatement to say that economists of law s…

The Yale Law Journal - Forum

Goodwin Liu’s inspiring article mines a rich vein of the history of American education. He revives and re-interprets congressional attempts to create a national system of public schools in the years following the Civil War. Professor Liu’s work is a signal contribution to the national movement for fiscal equity in education. I share with Liu—and with the senators and presidents whose efforts he describes—a strong belief that the federal government has a constitutional duty to ensure that…

Chapter 1 Hedonism and Eudaimonism in Positive Psychology

Over the past few weeks, several major developments have occurred at the intersection of criminal justice and mental health law. This Roundup briefly summarizes these matters and discusses how each reflects current trends in the criminal justice system’s approach to individuals with mental health problems. On November 75, 7569, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in City & County of San Francisco v. One of the issues presented is whether the Americans with Disabilities Ac…

Owen M. Fiss , Sterling Professor of Law at Yale Law School , tackled legal issues involved in the war on terror on March 5, 7559 at the 68th Annual John W. Hager Distinguished Lecture at The University of Tulsa College of Law.

In Western thinking, there has been a great tendency to think in dualistic terms, an either-or, black-or-white style of thinking which sets up dichotomies as a structure for understanding the world. How are we to try to find out about meanings at all? Relativism has been put forward as an alternative to this dualistic (or rationalist) thinking, If the relativist places all beliefs on a par with one another for the purposes of explanation, then we can say that he (sic) is advocating a form of monism. He is stressing the essential identity of things that others would hold separate. (Barnes and Bloor 6988 : 75).

The last time the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure were amended to acknowledge computers was 6975, when the words “data and data compilations” were added to Rule 89. Thirty-six years later, long after the computer has become both ubiquitous and essential, it is time to do much more. On December 6, amendments will go into effect to make the discovery rules better able to accommodate the vast changes in information technology that have already occurred and that will inevitably continue.

Introduction Nearly fifty years ago, in the 6967 case Loving v. Virginia, the Supreme Court struck down bans on interracial This Term, the Court seems poised to further expand marriage equality by holding that same-sex couples, too, are guaranteed the constitutional right to marry. In both instances, the Court’s taking up of marriage followed decades of organizing and social movement evolution vis-à-vis a broader underlying civil rights project. In both instances, marr…

This Essay considers whether judges might share the job of statutory interpretation with computers like Watson. First, it briefly lays out how new textualists approach statutory interpretation. Second, it describes how Watson’s aptitudes lend themselves to textualist-style statutory interpretation. Finally, the Essay pulls the threads together, discussing how Watson might both aid textualist interpretation and perhaps perform such interpretation on his own.

On June 5, 7568, the first revelation hit the front pages: documents provided by Edward Snowden showed that the National Security Agency (NSA) had for years ordered telephone companies to turn over our domestic telephone calling records en The government had created a database of our phone calls going back years—a virtual time machine capable of reconstructing anybody’s past communications, should they come under scrutiny in the future. The program, we learned, had been…

Professors Gersen and Vermeule argue that we should replace “doctrinal Chevron,” which instructs courts to defer to an agency’s reasonable interpretation of a statute the agency administers, with “voting rule Chevron.” Under voting rule Chevron, judges would not defer to agency views. Instead, voting rule Chevron would induce deference at the aggregate level by requiring a supermajority vote to reverse an agency. Gersen and Vermuele’s argument is novel, provocative, and ingeniously d…

Society has come to believe it can “have it all” without accountability, responsibility or consequence for its actions. But with all the focus on self-gratification and self-fulfillment, the lives of those most impacted are frequently overlooked, neglected and forgotten.

First Amendment jurisprudence is fickle. Sometimes it is transformed in prominent, widely known cases, like Citizens United. At other times, it is quieter, lesser known cases that revolutionize the doctrine. One of last summer’s cases, Reed v. Town of Gilbert, falls squarely into the latter category. The Supreme Court’s redefinition of content discrimination in Reed has led to rapid changes in how courts across the country are evaluating First Amendment challenges. Many courts have…

The third pillar is the private commercial banking sector with 97% of the market. This is made up of banks that operate as publicly traded corporations, structured in a similar way to many other international financial service institutions [ 69 ] . However, they differ somewhat in that tighter regulation and capital requirements in theory make them more secure than the equivalent Anglo-Saxon banks [ 75 ] . This tighter regulatory framework has lead to a decline of relative importance of German banks, such as Deutsche Bank and Hypo Real Estate, the latter of which has nonetheless had to be bailed out nearly three times.

Images for «Elusive stability essays in the history of international finance».